"My relationship with Capital One goes back to 1999, when I was solicited with an offer for a Visa card with a "fixed" 9.9% rate card. I applied over the phone, and was approved. The card was used for both purchases and balance transfers in a positive relationship with Capital One for eight years until July, 2007. That's when Capital One advised me in a billing insert that my "fixed" rate of 9.9% was being raised to 16.9%. No reason or explanation was given – I was not late on payment, and had not utilized the entire credit limit. This was a unilateral change to the terms of our agreement.
"In August, of 2007, I wrote a letter to Mr. Richard D. Fairbank, Chairman, President, and CEO of Capital One, at the McLean, Virginia home office. My written statement will contain a copy of Capital One's response which includes the line, 'Unfortunately, changes in the interest-rate environment or other business circumstances may require us to increase rates, even for fixed-rate accounts in good standing.'"
Neither Steven nor the other three credit card victims who were invited to testify actually did. Congressman Spencer Bauchus (R-AL) and the credit card companies led the rally to muzzle the consumers by demanding they agree to publicly release all of their private financial records – or not be able to testify. (Bauchus, not surprisingly, has been generously funded by the financial services industry.)
The bully tactic worked. Representatives from Capital One, Chase and Bank of America spoke for hours about how fair and consumer-friendly their practices were, citing "facts" without any supporting data. Yet the consumers who flew in to testify were silenced by the threat of the financial institutions being able to expose anything they wanted about the consumers or smear them after the hearings were over.
Rep. Mark Udall (D-CO) railed on behalf of his constituent Susan Wones, who traveled to D.C. to tell lawmakers about how her credit card company doubled her interest rate to 25 percent without notice and despite her record of paying her bills on time. Susan holds a high credit score rating, pays her bills on time and doesn't exceed her credit card limit.
"None of the consumer witnesses objected to signing releases that would allow the committee to verify the facts concerning their individual stories, and I must say that I found the Financial Services Committee’s insistence on a broad waiver of privacy rights to be both unnecessary and counter-productive," Udall said in a release. "Narrowly drawn waivers could have been drafted by Committee staff weeks ago, instead of waiting until the eleventh hour to prevent consumer testimony. What happened today is emblematic of why so many Americans are fed up with Washington."
Rep. Maloney has promised to hear the voices of these consumers. Time will tell if that does indeed happen.
For now, we have Steven's written testimony, which holds this analogy:
"The NFL does not allow one team, in the midst of the fourth quarter, to unilaterally move their end zone 20 yards in their favor just because they don't like the point spread. The rules are laid out before the kickoff, and the umpires enforce the same rules for both home and visiting teams for the whole contest. It's time for legislation at the federal level that tells the credit card industry, 'Game Over' to unilateral, one-sided, rule changes."
