Consumers Skeptical About New Credit Card Regulations

After years of complaints against the credit card companies for unfair and deceptive practices, the federal government approved sweeping new restrictions on credit card companies on Dec. 19. Consumer responses to the measure, however, show that many remain skeptical about the long-term benefits of the changes and strongly disapprove of the 18-month delay in implementation.

Many comments echoed the sentiments of one poster: "When was the last time Barnes & Noble called you up and said they wanted more money for the book they sold you last month? Have you EVER paid in full for a computer or a cd player or a shirt and later received a letter telling you the price was actually 500 or 1,000 percent more than what you had agreed to pay and you had better fork over the bucks? Credit card companies are not our friends; they should not be taking taxpayer hand-outs; they should not be permitted to abuse the citizens of this country. Further, I am SHOCKED that the new rules will not take effect for eighteen months. There is literally NO COST involved in effecting them NOW."

Another wrote: "These rules and regulations need to be implemented NOW, not almost two years from now. What a joke as the ripoff continues. How come the Wall Street bailouts always take place immediately, why do new taxes always take place immediately, but when it comes to given [sic] Main Street some help it always takes years from the time they pass the new rules."

Under the new regulations, banks, credit unions and savings associations are prohibited from raising interest rates on existing balances unless a payment was received more than 30 days late; charging a late fee if a borrower was given less than 21 days to pay; and applying payments in a way that would result in debts with higher interest rates getting repaid last. It also protects consumers against predatory credit cards that reduce available credit to subprime borrowers through fee harvesting.

"I believe the eighteen month grace period was a compromise," one commenter wrote. "This timing could make the regulations toothless. The potential is the banks will cull all accounts, reduce or eliminate available credit for millions, raise interest rates to 29.99% or higher for most people, raise late and overdraft fees to $50 or more, and use their current “contract” to extract as many dollars as possible from cardholders. When the new regulations go in effect they will have us where they want us."

The issue of consumer protection from credit card industry practices will continue to remain a priority in the Senate, according to Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.). In a recent Washington Post article, he is quoted as saying, "To restore our economic stability, we must stop credit card companies from ripping off their customers and driving them into deeper and deeper debt…While I expect the Federal Reserve's rules to be a significant step forward in addressing this issue, I believe we need a strong law in place to protect consumers from unfair credit card practices including 'anytime any reason' rate increases, universal default, excessive and unreasonable fees, and marketing targeted to young consumers."

The $970 billion industry stands to lose about $10-12 billion in annual revenue as a result of these changes. The banks have provided dire warnings about the measures, citing a probable decrease in the amount of available credit that would be extended to consumers and increased difficulty in qualifying for new credit.

But most agree with one poster's sentiments that the changes are long overdue: "Too little too late. Where was Congress when these scummy vultures were robbing the American public for the past 10-20 years? And why do they have 18 months to continue robbing us? Maybe to have more time to find loopholes and new ways to screw the public? Look, it's no secret any more that a large part of most banks revenues and profits come from usurous [sic] fees and bogus penalties. They have to find a way to continue to rob the public along these lines. And Congress has to give them time to find those ways so the campaign contributions continue to roll in."

The Fed Proposes Aggressive Restrictions on Abusive Credit Card Practices

In a move that is stunningly pro-consumer, the Federal Reserve Board has proposed tough new policies to curtail the types of abusive credit card practices that have been the subject of recent Congressional hearings.

These practices, which include arbitrary increases in credit card interest rates for existing balances, applying payments only to balances with the lowest interest rate rather than the highest rates and double-cycle billing (charging interest on debt that has already been paid), would be changed under the new, stricter policies. In addition, banks may also be required to give customers advance notices as well as the ability to opt out of overdraft programs.

The rules could go into effect by the end of this year.

The banks are already in an uproar over the proposed rules, which could affect more than 10,000 financial institutions. Industry representatives have begun threatening exhorbitant annual fees, elimination of balance transfers and increased interest rates. According to lobbyists, the restrictions would eliminate credit or make it more expensive to get credit.

The biggest source of angst for banks is the issue of universal default, which allows banks to increase a customer's interest rate for any reason, including defaults on other credit cards or loans, slight drops in credit scores or an increase in banks' cost of funds.

Eliminating universal default, known in bank lingo as "risk-based repricing," is a key component of a number of bills on Capitol Hill. The Fed's proposal would allow banks to raise rates when a consumer defaults on that account, and to consider "outside factors" to raise rates for new transactions. However, banks would not be allowed to use such factors to raise rates on existing balances.

According to On Wall Street, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase & Co. announced they would no longer do universal default; however, Bank of America still uses risk-based repricing, and Capital One reprices its customers when their cost of funds rate increases.

Consumer advocates are applauding the Fed's aggressive stance. A vote is expected today.